From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: scott.preece@motorola.com, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org,
matthew.a.locke@comcast.net
Subject: Re: nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?]]
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:50:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060923235036.GH21187@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200609191954.k8JJs6sK028848@olwen.urbana.css.mot.com>
Hi!
> | ...
> | > And if the only criteria for hardware-that-matters is hackability, then
> | > Nokia 770 can be flashed with your own kernel and rootfs. Check
> | > www.maemo.org
> |
> | I agree that Nokia is doing the right thing (tm) here (and
> | THANKS!). (Excluding charging circuity, but someone is going to fix
> | that). Unfortunately Motorola is not doing the right thing...
> ---
>
> Note that the 770 doesn't talk to a public network, over regulated
> frequencies and power ranges, and isn't constrained by, for instance,
> the GSM standards, and they're not constrained by the requirements
> of middlemen (carriers), so it's not really an apples-to-apples
> comparison.
Yes, 770 is in easier position...
> That said, I do respect the way they have been working directly in
> community projects.
...still, publicly downloadable SDK for userland software on
a1200/a780 would be nice. I do not think userland software can break
power levels/frequencies, so you should be okay, and symbian /
windowsCE certainly solved that problem before you...
To sum it up "it is nice that motorola uses linux, but you could do a
bit better".
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-23 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-19 19:54 nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?]] Scott E. Preece
2006-09-23 23:50 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-14 9:20 community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?] Matthew Locke
2006-09-14 10:05 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-09-14 10:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 12:15 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-09-14 13:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 14:56 ` David Brownell
2006-09-17 12:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-18 10:46 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-18 10:53 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-18 12:01 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-09-18 12:11 ` nokia 770 [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?]] Pavel Machek
2006-09-18 12:42 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-19 18:25 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060923235036.GH21187@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=matthew.a.locke@comcast.net \
--cc=scott.preece@motorola.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox