From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: suspending to disk on FC6 not working Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:21:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20061001032135.GB21796@redhat.com> References: <1159670982.3714.3.camel@soncomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1159670982.3714.3.camel@soncomputer> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Louis Garcia Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 10:49:42PM -0400, Louis Garcia wrote: > On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 15:55 -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > > That's it.. This issue seems to be a side effect of that patch... > > = > > Louis: After normal boot of 2.6.18, if you are not seeing the directory > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq > > = > > Then try reverting this patch > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git= ;a=3Dc > > ommit;h=3D911cb74bb9e77e40749abc2fca6fe74d87d940f3 > > = > > and then check whether the suspend resume issue goes away. = > > = > > Thanks, > > Venki > = > I reverted this patch and my suspend issue is gone. Though the > directory /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq is non existent, with or > without this patch. Ok, I've backed that out in cpufreq.git, it'll go along to Linus soon. If you build acpi-cpufreq as a module, and you modprobe acpi-cpufreq, does it fail silently ? Or does it revert us back to the behaviour where it's noisy again? Dave