From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: suspending to disk on FC6 not working Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 14:56:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20061001185657.GL28868@redhat.com> References: <20061001052203.GF28868@redhat.com> <200610011428.20557.rjw@sisk.pl> <20061001183607.GG28868@redhat.com> <20061001183852.GC2253@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061001183852.GC2253@elf.ucw.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 08:38:52PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sun 2006-10-01 14:36:07, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:28:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > = > > > Well, IMHO, making the module load when we know it won't work is a = hack > > > in the first place. :-) > > = > > That's just it, we *don't* know if it'll work or not until we load it. > = > Okay... but keeping it loaded (when it is unused) to silence some > warnings is stupid / hack. Can we teach userland to ignore the fact > that module failed to load, for example? Sounds like a good idea. Dave