Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)

matthieu castet
2006-10-08T08:56:39Z

Hi,

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc1 compared to 2.6.18
> that are not yet fixed Linus' tree.
>
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
> of you was declared guilty for a breakage or I'm considering you in any
> other way possibly involved with one or more of these issues.
>
> Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering.
>
>

>
> Subject : ueagle-atm Oops
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/6/390
> Submitter : Ernst Herzberg <list-lkml@net4u.de>
> Handled-By : Matthieu Castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
> Status : unknown
>
>
Guilty :
http://www.kernel.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e7ccdfec087f02930c5cdc81143d4a045ae8d361

Patch available at
https://mail.gna.org/public/ueagleatm-dev/2006-10/msg00022.html , but
some cleaning is need (I wasn't aware of "USB: fix __must_check warnings
in drivers/usb/atm/" patch).

Matthieu