From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] Block on access to temporarily unavailable pci device [version 3] Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:51:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20061019235149.GA5343@kroah.com> References: <20061017145146.GJ22289@parisc-linux.org> <20061019154128.GD2602@parisc-linux.org> <1161299636.16080.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1161299636.16080.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Adam Belay Cc: linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , Matthew Wilcox List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 07:13:56PM -0400, Adam Belay wrote: > It would be nice if we had sysfs expose struct file at some point... :) No it would not. I have yet to see a valid reason why to do this (everyone would be abusing sysfs even worse if it was present, you should see some of the requests I've had over the years...) thanks, greg k-h