From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Lorenz Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v3) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:47:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20061031124747.GG27390@gimli> References: <20061029231358.GI27968@stusta.de> <20061030135625.GB1601@mellanox.co.il> <45462591.7020200@ce.jp.nec.com> <454637BE.6090309@ce.jp.nec.com> <20061030183522.GL27968@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061030183522.GL27968@stusta.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Linus Torvalds , Jun'ichi Nomura , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , len.brown@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@osdl.org, "Randy.Dunlap" List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:35:22PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:16:34AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: [...] > Martin, Michael, can you send complete "dmesg -s 1000000" for both > 2.6.18.1 and a non-working 2.6.19-rc kernel after resume? > I don't have high hopes, but perhaps looking at the dmesg and/or > diff'ing them might give a hint. > there are quite a few outputs from different kernels on my webpage www.lorenz.eu.org/~mlo/kernel/?C=M;O=D I hope I can go deeper into that tonight, but at the moment I can't promise anything. gruss mlo -- Dipl.-Ing. Martin Lorenz They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin please encrypt your mail to me GnuPG key-ID: F1AAD37D get it here: http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF1AAD37D ICQ UIN: 33588107