Re: cpufreq user<->kernel interface removal [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP]

Greg KH
2006-09-12T03:35:37Z

On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:50:25PM -0700, Mark Gross wrote:
> The PowerOP patch has nothing to do with the removal of cpufreq. You
> may be confusing this work with the david signleton patch.

I am totally confused about who is working on what, and what provides
what.

Can someone make quick cheat-sheet that shows the different
developers/companies and projects here? The fact that it's impossible
to keep this straight in the first place does not bode well...

Or, can each of the different projects send a _short_, 1 paragraph, 4
sentance maximum summary of the different things. Think of it as your
"elevator pitch". The different multi-page summaries ware making my
eyes glaze over...

thanks,

greg k-h