From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/6] [-mm]: ACPI: duplicate ACPI procfs functions in sysfs Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:13:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20070108131318.GC25933@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1168083306.5619.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200701061421.41342.david-b@pacbell.net> <20070107055424.GA24853@srcf.ucam.org> <1168256428.5754.98.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1168256428.5754.98.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Zhang Rui Cc: Matthew Garrett , David Brownell , "linux-acpi@vger" , linux-pm@osdl.org, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi! > This patch set is against acpi-test sysfs branch which already converts > ACPI to follow driver model. Now the ACPI procfs functions are > duplicated in sysfs step by step. And I want the ACPI interface in sysfs > works exactly the same way as in procfs. No, you can't port same broken interface into sysfs. Some /proc interfaces are horrible, and we do not want to create _exactly same_ horrible interfaces in /sys. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html