From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [-mm]: ACPI: duplicate ACPI procfs functions in sysfs Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:15:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20070125131503.GC23511@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1168083306.5619.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1168256428.5754.98.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200701101253.28151.david-b@pacbell.net> <200701242317.48273.lenb@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701242317.48273.lenb@kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Len Brown Cc: Matthew Garrett , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, "linux-acpi@vger" , linux-pm@osdl.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > There will be another ACPI patch at some point, actually kicking > > in hooks needed to handle system wakeup, but getting the PC into > > the RTC class framework is an important first step. > > = > > Once there's a proper replacement for /proc/acpi/alarm it becomes > > a candidate for removal. Maybe sooner rather than later, unless > > some users for that old file turn up... > = > Sometimes that file's syntax is useful -- wake up at 7:00, > but those testing suspend-resume want to wake up 1 minute in the future > now mater what time it is... Write a shell script then. "Calculating times in future is conventient, lets hack it into kernel". OOps? Pavel -- = (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html