From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: [PATCH]switching off autosuspend through sysfs Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:27:33 +0100 Message-ID: <200701261527.33767.oneukum@suse.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-usb-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: linux-usb-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Alan Stern Cc: David Brownell , Greg KH , Linux-pm mailing list , USB development list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2007 17:51 schrieb Alan Stern: > > Hm, I missed that. =A0This seems to be a very usb-specific thing at the > > moment. > = > It is USB-specific because I wanted to start out in a well-defined = > environment where the mechanisms could get tested and shaken out. =A0When = > the problems are gone, it will make sense to think about moving the whole = > autosuspend infrastructure into the PM core. USB has some advantages. There's only one level of suspend, which is supposed to be mandatory. In addition, it's important for PM because USB always means DMA. Regards Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DDE= VDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel