From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: [PATCH 03/10] powerpc: fix comment in kernel/irq.c Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 19:30:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20070205185836.099816000@sipsolutions.net> References: <20070205183026.989209000@sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline; filename=irq-comment.patch List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Torrance List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org kernel/irq.c contains a comment that speaks of -1 and -2 as interrupt numbers. Replace by NO_IRQ and NO_IRQ_IGNORE. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg Cc: Andrew Morton --- mb-wireless.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c 2007-02-05 14:24:06.69452686= 4 +0100 +++ mb-wireless/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c 2007-02-05 14:24:37.084526864 +01= 00 @@ -281,10 +281,10 @@ void do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs) = /* * Every platform is required to implement ppc_md.get_irq. - * This function will either return an irq number or -1 to + * This function will either return an irq number or NO_IRQ to * indicate there are no more pending. - * The value -2 is for buggy hardware and means that this IRQ - * has already been handled. -- Tom + * The value NO_IRQ_IGNORE is for buggy hardware and means that this + * IRQ has already been handled. -- Tom */ irq =3D ppc_md.get_irq(); = --