From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:31:21 +0100 Message-ID: <200702111931.23135.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200702111536.20871.rjw@sisk.pl> <84144f020702110719i27718657s4c74a4f7217cce6@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <84144f020702110719i27718657s4c74a4f7217cce6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Robert Hancock , Matthew Garrett , Pavel Machek , Jeff Garzik , Daniel Barkalow , pm list , Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:19, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 2/11/07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Unfortunately it has to be done in one shot for all of the known good d= rivers to avoid > > user-observable regressions. > = > No you don't. You can make it a config option that defaults to n > during a transition period. Yes, that's possible. Greetings, Rafael