From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:10:11 +0100 Message-ID: <200702120010.13996.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200702111953.02229.rjw@sisk.pl> <1171235166.4493.100.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1171235166.4493.100.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net Cc: Robert Hancock , Matthew Garrett , Pavel Machek , Jeff Garzik , Daniel Barkalow , pm list , Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Monday, 12 February 2007 00:06, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > = > On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 19:53 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Having drivers explicitly marked as to whether they are safe is a goo= d kernel > > > feature; what to do if they're not is policy. > > = > > That's true, but I assume that the people who opt for doing that are al= so > > willing to take part in the review of the drivers. :-) > = > Absolutely :) > = > > Well, I don't think so. Let's estimate the number of drivers that defi= ne > > .resume() right now: > > = > > $ grep -I -l -r '.resume =3D' linux-2.6.20/drivers/ | wc > > 102 102 4169 > = > I think the '.resume =3D' doesn't help - some have tabs. I ran '\.resume' > and got 351. Ah, good catch. I have searched for ".resume" only and got 612, but this is the number of files, not the number of drivers. And it is not exactly large. ;-) > It would be interesting to see how many struct pci_driver etc instances > lack resume methods. Yes, I'll try to invent a test. Greetings, Rafael