From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 0/6] rtc framework: remove class_device, use class suspend()/resume() Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:44:31 -0800 Message-ID: <200702221244.32442.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <200702211945.15003.david-b@pacbell.net> <20070222180941.GA15289@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070222180941.GA15289@kroah.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Greg KH Cc: Alessandro Zummo , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, john stultz , Andrew Morton , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Linux Kernel list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 22 February 2007 10:09 am, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 07:45:14PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > = > > The main point of this series of patches is that last one, which I'll > > circulate just a bit more widely. (Although I think the first four are > > also nice cleanups!) It might be the first example of a framework that > > uses the "new" class level suspend()/resume() calls to offload drivers. > > = > > .. > = > All of these looks good to me, feel free to add an: > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > to them if you want. Thanks ... = > thanks for doing the class_device removal work, I appreciate it. Actually the class_device removal work was because that was the only way to clean the RTC suspend()/remove() patch out of my queue, where it's been sitting since not log after those class suspend/resume methods started to circulate, early last summer. It'll be good to have that finally gone! - Dave