From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: several messages Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:15:01 -0800 Message-ID: <200702221715.03195.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <200702211929.17203.david-b@pacbell.net> <200702211950.22422.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Torrance , Alessandro Zummo , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, john stultz , Andrew Morton , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Johannes Berg , Linux Kernel list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 22 February 2007 2:58 pm, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > = > I think, we only want 1, right? And the latter seems to be more generic / = > platform independent? And as a side-effect, powermac would have to migrat= e = > to generic rtc:-) I'd certainly think that restoring the system clock should be, as much as possible, in platform-agnostic code. Like the generic RTC framework. And hmm, that powermac/time.c file replicates other RTC code... Minor obstacle: removing the EXPERIMENTAL label from that code. - Dave