From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:02:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20070227100202.GV3822@kernel.dk> References: <20070225175559.GC12392@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070225175559.GC12392@stusta.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Thomas Gleixner , Michal Piotrowski , Daniel Walker , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 25 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc1 compared to 2.6.20 > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. > = > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one > of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch > of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly > involved with one or more of these issues. > = > Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering. > = > = > Subject : ThinkPad T60: system doesn't come out of suspend to RAM > (CONFIG_NO_HZ) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/391 > Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin > Thomas Gleixner > Handled-By : Ingo Molnar > Status : unknown x60 doesn't resume from S2R either, it doesn't matter if CONFIG_NO_HZ is set or not though. 2.6.20 worked fine. -- = Jens Axboe