From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-pm@lists.osdl.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2)
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:14:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070302071423.GA30634@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703011536450.12485@woody.linux-foundation.org>
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Btw, you seem to have re-ordered the commits - the above is not the
> order you did the bisection in. The known-good commit (f3ccb06..) is
> in the middle. [...]
no - i simply picked them by hand, based on looking at gittk output,
because bisection did not appear to find anything useful:
9f4bd5dde81b5cb94e4f52f2f05825aa0422f1ff is first bad commit
And via that method i found a couple of more 'good' points - which
git-bisect never picked up by itself. (and i did 3-4 separate git-bisect
sessions, one of them was a "git-bisect start drivers/acpi/" - which is
the main area of suspicion). I looked at git-bisect visualize more than
once, and i've attached one of the bisection logs below.
i also think i know what happens. Firstly, my testing is reliable, as i
mentioned it in the other mail i frequently re-visited commits to make
sure that none of my bad/good decisions is spurios - but no, the test
results are extremely reproducable: either the laptop resumes properly
after flashing its disk light or it does not.
the problem i think is that i simply took git-bisect's behavior for
granted (i used it many times already) but forgot about a very basic
precondition: git-bisect will find only a /single/ good->bad transition.
If there is a bad->good transition combined with a good->bad transition
then git-bisect will think it's the same 'badness', while it's a
/former/ badness that it is honing in on - totally sending the bisection
off into la-la-land.
so as i mentioned it in the first mail: i /know/ that this commit is a
bad->good transition point:
f3ccb06f3b8e0cf42b579db21f3ca7f17fcc3f38
/and i only want to test commits that include this commit/ - because i
know that without this commit git-bisect confuses the /other/ breakage
with the new breakage. In the bisection log below, this choice of
git-bisect:
ee404566f97f9254433399fbbcfa05390c7c55f7
is 'bad' according to testing, but that's 'another' badness - and i
missed it.
Now, having slept on it, the solution is very simple: whenever
git-bisect picks a commit for which the following command comes up
empty:
git-log | grep f3ccb06f3b8e0cf42b579db21f3ca7f17fcc3f38
then i'll mark it "git-bisect good" - artificially marking the older
badness as a 'good' area. That way git-bisect will find the right
good->bad transition point.
btw., that's why i tried to pick up commits by hand, making sure that
commit f3ccb06f3b8e0cf42b579db21f3ca7f17fcc3f38 is always included - but
got lost in the maze of the commit graph, and didnt realize that there
is a simple solution. Nevertheless i wanted to dump the information i
already gathered. Those commits were totally out of order, etc. - they
were picked by a poor human who is much worse at walking graphs than
git-bisect ;-)
Ingo
git-bisect start
# bad: [01363220f5d23ef68276db8974e46a502e43d01d] [PARISC] clocksource: Move update_cr16_clocksource later in boot
git-bisect bad 01363220f5d23ef68276db8974e46a502e43d01d
# good: [f3ccb06f3b8e0cf42b579db21f3ca7f17fcc3f38] ACPI: Disable wake GPEs only once.
git-bisect good f3ccb06f3b8e0cf42b579db21f3ca7f17fcc3f38
# bad: [ee404566f97f9254433399fbbcfa05390c7c55f7] sysctl: mips/au1000: remove sys_sysctl support
git-bisect bad ee404566f97f9254433399fbbcfa05390c7c55f7
# bad: [c827ba4cb49a30ce581201fd0ba2be77cde412c7] Merge master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-2.6
git-bisect bad c827ba4cb49a30ce581201fd0ba2be77cde412c7
# bad: [68a696a01f482859a9fe937249e8b3d44252b610] Merge branch 'upstream' of git://ftp.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/upstream-tc
git-bisect bad 68a696a01f482859a9fe937249e8b3d44252b610
# bad: [1c433fbda4896a6455d97b66a4f2646cbdd52a8c] [ALSA] soc - 0.13 ASoC headers
git-bisect bad 1c433fbda4896a6455d97b66a4f2646cbdd52a8c
# bad: [048b945077bdc7e8dff5d5810ff2a0ced3590ca9] [ALSA] echoaudio, add TLV support
git-bisect bad 048b945077bdc7e8dff5d5810ff2a0ced3590ca9
# bad: [c07584c83287ae5a13cc836f69a1d824ad068c66] [ALSA] hda-codec - Add support for Medion laptops
git-bisect bad c07584c83287ae5a13cc836f69a1d824ad068c66
# bad: [dbc6b6ad767c86907db373e85139b0e975ba7599] [ALSA] ASoC codecs: generic AC97 support
git-bisect bad dbc6b6ad767c86907db373e85139b0e975ba7599
# bad: [b66b3cfe6c2f6560f351278883a325b6ebc478f5] [ALSA] hda_intel: increase maximum DMA buffer size to 1024MB
git-bisect bad b66b3cfe6c2f6560f351278883a325b6ebc478f5
# bad: [12b131c4cf3eb1dc8a60082a434b7b100774c2e7] [ALSA] allow registering an alsa device with struct device pointer
git-bisect bad 12b131c4cf3eb1dc8a60082a434b7b100774c2e7
# bad: [e4f8e656d8c152c08cd44d0e3c21f009fab09952] [ALSA] usb-audio: allow pausing
git-bisect bad e4f8e656d8c152c08cd44d0e3c21f009fab09952
# bad: [1700f3080d98323e91864d67cb9f6d46f818ccf0] [ALSA] usb-audio: merge playback/capture hardware information structs
git-bisect bad 1700f3080d98323e91864d67cb9f6d46f818ccf0
# bad: [9f4bd5dde81b5cb94e4f52f2f05825aa0422f1ff] [ALSA] snd-emu10k1: Added support for emu1010, including E-Mu 1212m and E-Mu 1820m
git-bisect bad 9f4bd5dde81b5cb94e4f52f2f05825aa0422f1ff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-02 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702202043280.4043@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-25 17:52 ` 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 1) Adrian Bunk
2007-02-28 18:16 ` Karasyov, Konstantin A
2007-02-25 17:55 ` 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2) Adrian Bunk
2007-02-27 10:02 ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-27 10:21 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-27 10:30 ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-27 10:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-02-27 10:59 ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-27 11:15 ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-27 13:09 ` Jens Axboe
2007-03-01 9:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-01 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-01 14:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-01 16:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-02 0:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-02 0:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-02 7:14 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-03-02 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-02 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-02 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-02 10:22 ` [patch] KVM: T60 resume fix Ingo Molnar
2007-03-02 11:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-03 8:22 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-03 8:21 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-03 11:57 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-03 12:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-05 8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 8:50 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-05 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 9:27 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-05 10:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 10:33 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-05 10:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 10:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-05 12:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-05 12:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 13:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-05 13:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 10:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-05 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 15:44 ` 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2) Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-05 16:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-05 16:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 18:16 ` Jens Axboe
2007-03-01 23:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-02 10:07 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-05 8:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-05 10:11 ` SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning Ingo Molnar
2007-03-06 5:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-06 6:35 ` Kok, Auke
2007-03-06 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-06 15:34 ` Kok, Auke
2007-03-07 4:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-07 16:31 ` Kok, Auke
2007-03-07 16:45 ` Kok, Auke
2007-03-07 19:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-08 2:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-08 6:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-08 9:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-08 17:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-08 19:58 ` [PATCH 0/2] Repair pci_restore_state when used with device resets Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-08 20:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] msi: Safer state caching Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-08 20:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] pci: Repair pci_save/restore_state so we can restore one save many times Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-12 22:46 ` Kok, Auke
2007-03-08 20:08 ` [PATCH 0/2] Repair pci_restore_state when used with device resets Ingo Molnar
2007-03-08 20:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-08 10:23 ` SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-11 11:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-11 11:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-11 17:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-11 18:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-11 18:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-11 18:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-11 19:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-12 4:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-04-16 19:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-09 23:06 ` Kok, Auke
2007-03-10 3:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-06 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-06 16:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-06 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-06 17:09 ` Kok, Auke
2007-03-09 6:44 ` 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2) Pavel Machek
2007-03-05 15:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-02-27 22:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-02-28 7:41 ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-26 22:01 ` 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1) Adrian Bunk
2007-02-27 4:09 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2007-02-27 12:50 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-02-27 13:25 ` Ismail Dönmez
2007-02-28 21:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-02-28 21:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-28 21:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-01 3:45 ` Jeff Chua
2007-03-02 12:26 ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2007-03-03 11:17 ` Jens Axboe
2007-03-05 0:04 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-06 1:32 ` Jeff Chua
2007-03-06 12:03 ` Jeff Chua
2007-03-06 12:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-03-06 12:12 ` Jeff Chua
2007-03-19 15:32 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-19 21:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070302071423.GA30634@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@mellanox.co.il \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox