From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:26:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20070302122641.GA3034@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20070226220152.GA29575@stusta.de> <20070228211318.GB4301@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Chua Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Adrian Bunk , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu 2007-03-01 11:45:35, Jeff Chua wrote: > On 3/1/07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > with 2.6.20, pressing Fn/F4 generates an ACPI event and triggers suspend to RAM. > > > > On 2.6.21-rc2, after resume (when the box is accessible from network), > > pressing Fn/F4 again does not seem to have any effect. > > I have the same problem on my IBM X60s on rc1 and rc2. Can't resume > from RAM, can't suspend to disk. It is possible to revert all the > changes to ACPI and test it? As I said elsewhere in the thread, suspend/resume to RAM works ok on my thinkpad x60. I posted my .config there, perhaps difference is in it? Ingo identified KVM as possible culprit. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html