From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] swsusp: Do not use page flags (was: Re: Remove page flags for software suspend) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:11:57 +0100 Message-ID: <200703082311.58605.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200703041450.02178.rjw@sisk.pl> <1173369225.9438.32.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1173369225.9438.32.camel@twins> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Nick Piggin , Pavel Machek , linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter , Johannes Berg , pm list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 8 March 2007 16:53, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 14:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > = > > Okay, the next three messages contain patches that should do the trick. > > = > > They have been tested on x86_64, but not very thoroughly. > = > They look good to me, but what do I know about swsusp :-) = > I'll stick them in my laptop's kernel (boring i386-UP) and see what > happens. Thanks! > I did notice you don't stick KERN_ prio markers in your printk()s not > sure what to think of that (or if its common practise and I'm just not > aware of it). This means use the default (which initially is KERN_WARNING, AFAICT). > Thanks for doing this. You're welcome. :-) Rafael