From: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Eugeny Mints <eugeny@nomadgs.com>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: Alternative Concept
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:34:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070313203458.GA1213@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070313110851.GB10702@elf.ucw.cz>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:08:51PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I believe this power parameter framework should solve many (if not
> > all) of the issues raised by using operating points as the base
> > abstraction and provide a common layer across architectures. Eugeny
> > and I have the beginnings of an API proposal for this framework, but
> > we wanted to get some high level feedback on the concepts so we can
> > adjust the API if necessary. So, comments?
>
> Looks better than powerop certainly.
>
> Perhaps first step would be to convert cpufreq to this new framework?
The first step is to get a parameter framework in upstream.
It will take some time for the applications of this proposed framework
to materialize and drive the maturing of the implementation. These
won't get written unless a framework is upstream.
I don't know if having cpufreq plug into this framework will ever make a
lot of sense. However; it would be simple to create a cpufreq driver
that access the parameter layer for some selected platforms. (N800?)
--mgross
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-13 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-24 1:23 [RFC] CPUFreq PowerOP integration, Intro 0/3 Eugeny S. Mints
2006-10-07 2:36 ` Alternative Concept [Was: Re: [RFC] CPUFreq PowerOP integration, Intro 0/3] Dominik Brodowski
2006-10-07 3:15 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-10-08 7:16 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-12 15:38 ` Mark Gross
2006-10-12 16:02 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-10-16 21:56 ` Mark Gross
2006-10-17 21:40 ` Matthew Locke
2006-10-12 16:48 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-12 17:12 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-10-12 17:23 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-09 18:21 ` Mark Gross
2006-10-26 3:06 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-10-12 22:43 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-10-13 10:55 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-16 21:44 ` Mark Gross
2006-10-17 8:26 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-26 3:05 ` Dominik Brodowski
2007-03-13 0:57 ` Alternative Concept Matthew Locke
2007-03-13 11:08 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-13 20:34 ` Mark Gross [this message]
2007-03-14 2:30 ` Ikhwan Lee
2007-03-14 10:43 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-14 17:19 ` David Brownell
2007-03-14 18:12 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-14 18:45 ` David Brownell
2007-03-15 9:53 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-15 13:04 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-16 2:21 ` David Brownell
2007-03-16 3:56 ` Ikhwan Lee
2007-03-16 6:17 ` David Brownell
2007-03-19 2:27 ` Ikhwan Lee
2007-03-19 6:07 ` David Brownell
2007-03-16 13:06 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-16 18:03 ` David Brownell
2007-03-18 20:25 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-19 4:04 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 0:03 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 8:07 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 9:45 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 10:30 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-20 12:13 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-20 12:39 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-20 13:44 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 21:03 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 13:07 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 13:52 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-20 14:58 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 15:36 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 19:16 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 20:45 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 22:04 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 22:06 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 23:29 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 15:36 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-20 19:17 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 20:17 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 20:21 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 19:58 ` David Brownell
2007-03-24 0:47 ` charging batteries from USB [was: Re: Alternative Concept] Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-24 1:17 ` David Brownell
2007-03-24 1:48 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-24 2:35 ` David Brownell
2007-03-24 10:20 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-24 8:36 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-14 3:19 ` Alternative Concept Dominik Brodowski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-14 22:08 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-14 23:23 ` David Brownell
2007-03-15 7:25 ` Ikhwan Lee
2007-03-15 8:14 ` Amit Kucheria
2007-03-15 10:55 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-15 10:46 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-15 10:33 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-15 13:21 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-15 13:29 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-15 23:07 ` David Brownell
2007-03-15 14:00 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-15 14:38 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2007-03-15 17:33 ` Woodruff, Richard
2007-03-19 14:12 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-20 7:56 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 14:26 ` Amit Kucheria
2007-03-20 15:08 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-20 17:04 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070313203458.GA1213@linux.intel.com \
--to=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eugeny@nomadgs.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox