From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:32:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20070319153222.GF1915@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20070226220152.GA29575@stusta.de> <20070228211318.GB4301@mellanox.co.il> <20070305000421.GF3441@stusta.de> <20070306120808.GA9537@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Chua Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Adrian Bunk , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Ingo Molnar , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > >> > > > I have the same problem on my IBM X60s on rc1 and rc2. Can't resume > >> > > > from RAM, can't suspend to disk. It is possible to revert all the > >> > > > changes to ACPI and test it? > >> > > > >> > > This is with CONFIG_KVM=n? > >> > > >> > Yes. > >> > >> I've tried with CONFIG_KVM=n and CONFIG_KVM=y and both does not suspend. > > > >Do you mean that they "do not resume after suspend"? > > I can't even suspend to disk/ram. It just hangs and the lights just > blink and everything else hangs. With 2.6.20, it works fine. Turn up console loglevel, and see where it hangs... -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html