public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] dynamic device power management proposal
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:30:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070320183022.GC2670@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1174295302.31250.1.camel@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com>

Hi!

> Runtime device power management or dynamic device power management
> (dpm).
> 
> Why dpm: 
>      1. put an idle device into low power state to save power 
>      2. speed up S3/S4. In resume time, we could resume devices only as
>         the devices are used. In suspend time, we could skip suspended
>         devices. (suspend/resume a device equals to change device state)
> 
> Basically we need device driver support, a kernel framework and a policy
> (determine when to change a device???s power state).

So far so good, but please use ascii ' for '.

> I think we need answer below questions:
> 1. How to present device???s power info/control interface to policy.
...

Depends on bus, I'm afraid. We do not want to do this in generic code.

> 2. How to handle devices dependences. For example, for a PCI endpoint
...

USB gets the dependencies right, just copy that.

> 3. How to detect if a device is idle.

USB gets this right. It is driver specific, but core can provide some
helpers.

> int foo() //all service routines of the driver should do
> { 
>             //wakeup the device if it???s suspended
>             dpm_active_device();

No, we do not want this kind of interface. It should be something like
mod_timer(my_timer, HZ+10);

We can talk about generic device attribute "powerdown_timeout" in
sysfs... but I'd prefer few more drivers that do powersave before we
do that.

> We consider two type devices:
> 1. for soundcard, policy does:
> a. Setup a timer, the timer polls soundcard???s busy_timestamp sysfs file.
> b. if the timer found soundcard is idle for a long time, write the
> device???s state sysfs file, and sound card to low power state.
> c. policy does nothing to resume soundcard. Soundcard driver???s service
> routine will call ???dpm_active_device??? to resume the device

No, that's not how it works; look at hda_audio, it already has
powersave. Just power down audio card 5 seconds after its control file
is closed.

> 2. For keyboard or mouse, policy does:
> a. setup a timer, the timer polls keyboard???s busy_timestamp sysfs file.
> b. if the timer found keyboard is idle for a long time, write LCD???s
> state sysfs file to close LCD.
> c. After LCD is closed, policy polls keyboard???s busy_timestamp sysfs
> file.
> d. if the content changed of the file (maybe using inotify), policy will
> open LCD

This already works for usb keyboard/mice.

> This is my preliminary design, and I???d like to listen to your opinions.

"Seriously overdesigned".
									Pavel


-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-20 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-19  9:08 [RFC] dynamic device power management proposal Shaohua Li
2007-03-19 15:44 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-20  1:06   ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-20 14:58     ` Alan Stern
2007-03-21  1:43       ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-21 14:44         ` Alan Stern
2007-03-22  4:42   ` Len Brown
2007-03-22 11:56     ` Jim Gettys
2007-03-22 19:28       ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 13:20     ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 13:44       ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 13:56         ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 14:18           ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 14:22             ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 14:26               ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 14:35                 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 19:41     ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 19:58   ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 18:30 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-03-21  1:34   ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-21 15:21     ` Amit Kucheria
2007-03-21 21:49       ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-21 22:54         ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-21 21:39     ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22  3:09       ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-22 13:13         ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 19:20       ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 20:32         ` Alan Stern
2007-03-22 20:02 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 22:10   ` Greg KH
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-21 20:19 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-21 21:45 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-26 13:53 ` Amit Kucheria
2007-03-22 13:39 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-22 13:48 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 14:01 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 14:45 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-22 18:53   ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 19:05 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-27 12:05 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-27 12:19   ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 19:18 Scott E. Preece

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070320183022.GC2670@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox