From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: 32-bit user suspend program on 64-bit kernel? Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:05:52 +0100 Message-ID: <200703211505.52812.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1174468281.3769.7.camel@johannes.berg> <20070321122820.GA4523@elf.ucw.cz> <1174480277.4230.9.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1174480277.4230.9.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 13:31, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 13:28 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > = > > > compat code for the ioctl which shares pointers and structs, is there > > > any way to make it possible? > > = > > That means that either ioctl is very hw-specific, or you've found a > > bug. > = > I think I'll just have to give it a try. Unfortunately the numbers of ioctls are not portable due to my rookie mista= ke in the beginning (using void * in _IOW() and friends which passed with no objections). I'm ashamed of that, but it's probably too late to fix it. :-( Greetings, Rafael