From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: + rework-pm_ops-pm_disk_mode-kill-misuse.patch added to -mm tree Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:56:14 -0800 Message-ID: <20070322015614.dafa1ed7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <200703212334.l2LNYDjj007030@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20070322094825.GA29627@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070322094825.GA29627@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Russell King Cc: pavel@ucw.cz, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:48:26 +0000 Russell King wrot= e: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:34:13PM -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > > It also removes all the arm and sh users that think they can veto suspe= nd to > > disk via pm_ops; not so since the user can always do echo shutdown > > > /sys/power/disk, they need to find a better way involving Kconfig or su= ch. > = > NAK. There are ARM platforms where suspend to disk doesn't make any > sense what so ever. So they shouldn't offer it in Kconfig?