From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] dynamic device power management proposal
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:58:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703221258.33306.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0703191135360.14222-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Monday 19 March 2007 8:44 am, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Shaohua Li wrote:
>
> > ...
> > Basically we need device driver support, a kernel framework and a policy
> > (determine when to change a deviceâs power state).
>
> A lot of development along these lines has already been going on in the
> USB subsystem. It isn't complete yet, but a lot of the ideas you raise
> have already been implemented.
ISTR pointing out a few years ago that USB makes a good testbed for
such things, in technical terms ... it's got the "complete problem"
wrapped up in one more-or-less modern subsystem. So making it do
PM well has been an object lesson in how the Linux PM infrastructure
works -- or, too often, doesn't.
The most troublesome spot being that ACPI interferes on PCs, so we
can't yet do stuff like put EHCI/OHCI/UHCI controllers into PCI_D2 at
runtime and rely on remote wakeup. But embedded Linux systems make
it easy to work with saner frameworks; on those systems you can see
even more of the pieces working well together. :)
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-22 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-19 9:08 [RFC] dynamic device power management proposal Shaohua Li
2007-03-19 15:44 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-20 1:06 ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-20 14:58 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-21 1:43 ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-21 14:44 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-22 4:42 ` Len Brown
2007-03-22 11:56 ` Jim Gettys
2007-03-22 19:28 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 13:20 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 13:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 13:56 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 14:18 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 14:22 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 14:26 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 14:35 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 19:41 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 19:58 ` David Brownell [this message]
2007-03-20 18:30 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-21 1:34 ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-21 15:21 ` Amit Kucheria
2007-03-21 21:49 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-21 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-21 21:39 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 3:09 ` Shaohua Li
2007-03-22 13:13 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 19:20 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 20:32 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-22 20:02 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 22:10 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-21 20:19 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-21 21:45 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-26 13:53 ` Amit Kucheria
2007-03-22 13:39 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-22 13:48 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 14:01 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 14:45 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-22 18:53 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 19:05 Scott E. Preece
2007-03-27 12:05 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-27 12:19 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-03-22 19:18 Scott E. Preece
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703221258.33306.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox