From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [RFC] dynamic device power management proposal Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:10:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20070322221036.GE20713@kroah.com> References: <1174295302.31250.1.camel@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com> <200703221302.39052.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703221302.39052.david-b@pacbell.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:02:38PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 19 March 2007 2:08 am, Shaohua Li wrote: > > This is my preliminary design, and I???d like to listen to your opinion= s. > = > Best forwarded as a patch, not a tarfile... Especially as some of us don't even look at the tarfile... > And also, best expressed as improvements to the standard driver model > PM framework, rather than something new. For example, pick one issue > that the driver model doesn't handle well enough to suit you, and > work on patches to solve that. Exactly. Remember, one tiny step at a time please. thanks, greg k-h