From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove software_suspend() and fix compile w/ SOFTWARE_SUSPEND disabled Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:12:44 +0100 Message-ID: <200703222212.45050.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1174571192.32051.5.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1174571192.32051.5.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:46, Johannes Berg wrote: > This patch kills off software_suspend() and all it's users, > pm_suspend(PM_SUSPEND_DISK) is much cleaner anyway. Also, this > makes the kernel compile again w/o CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND after > Rafael's patches to kill the suspend pageflags broke it. The patches have been reworked after Andrew rejected them due to this break= age. The current versions are in the -mm tree (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/20/32= 7). > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki > = > --- > Have the pageflags removal patches been applied anywhere already? If so > please just apply this on top. If not, could you (Rafael) then fix your > patches to compile w/o software suspend and then I'll post the removal > of software_suspend() as an extra patch. See above. :-) As far as the rest of the patch is concerned, I have no objections. Rafael