From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Scott E. Preece" <preece@motorola.com>
Cc: alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com, ben@simtec.co.uk,
linux-arm@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, dirk.behme@de.bosch.com,
pavel@ucw.cz, johannes@sipsolutions.net, nico@cam.org,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, g.liakhovetski@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] implement pm_ops.valid for everybody
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:33:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703222233.06146.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703221344.l2MDi2Q9007989@olwen.urbana.css.mot.com>
On Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:44, Scott E. Preece wrote:
>
> | From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> |
> | On Wednesday, 21 March 2007 23:57, Pavel Machek wrote:
> | > Hi!
> | >
> | > > > Which is very much an indication of how weak ACPI is. It
> | > > > doesn't contemplate typical SOC behavior, which have a wide
> | > > > variety of system sleep states that leave the CPU on ... and
> | > > > which may not even *have* (or need!) a "cpu off" state.
> | > > >
> | > > > My own definition would be more like: the minimal RAM-based
> | > > > power-saving system state is "standby". If the system
> | > > > implements a deeper RAM-based system sleep state, that's "STR".
> | > >
> | > > Hmmm, this leaves the decision how to call each state COMPLETELY to the
> | > > implementor, doesn't it?
> | >
> | > Is that a problem? If someone is clever enough to implement suspend, I
> | > think we can trust them to name their states right.
> | >
> | > (And trust me, we can flame them if not).
> | >
> | > (Anyway, my definition would be "mem" == RAM is powered, everything
> | > else is down, except for devices needed for wakeup; "standby" ==
> | > something is powered that can be powered down, we'll fix that in next version).
> |
> | I think we can define "standby" a bit more precisely. Something like:
> | - processes are frozen,
> | - devices are suspended,
> | - nonboot CPUs are down (and in low powered states, if possible),
> | - "system" devices may or may not be suspended, depending on the platform,
> | - the boot CPU may or may not be in a low power state, depending on the platform,
> | - RAM is powered
> | - wake up need not be BIOS-driven (main difference from "mem")
> ---
>
> I would be tempted to say that that last bullet is the distinguishing
> characteristic - that you come back from standby by just continuing
> where you left off, but you come back from StR by something akin to
> booting.
Yes, that's what I meant.
Greetings,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-22 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-22 13:44 [PATCH] implement pm_ops.valid for everybody Scott E. Preece
2007-03-22 18:29 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 19:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2007-03-22 21:16 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 13:15 ` tony
2007-03-23 18:25 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 21:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-22 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-22 21:43 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 21:56 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-22 22:42 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-22 22:56 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 23:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-22 23:55 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 1:14 ` Matthew Locke
2007-03-23 13:17 ` tony
2007-03-23 13:35 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-23 14:52 ` tony
2007-03-23 15:17 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-23 18:51 ` Matthew Locke
2007-03-23 19:19 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-23 18:29 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 19:21 ` Matthew Locke
2007-03-23 20:11 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 6:46 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-23 16:15 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 21:08 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-24 0:52 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 13:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-23 17:57 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 20:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-24 0:01 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-24 0:54 ` David Brownell
2007-03-24 20:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-24 0:41 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-24 20:49 ` David Brownell
2007-03-24 21:01 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-25 1:02 ` David Brownell
2007-03-24 21:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-24 22:19 ` David Brownell
2007-03-25 10:26 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-25 15:20 ` David Brownell
2007-03-25 16:23 ` Jim Gettys
2007-03-25 16:55 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 18:18 ` Matthew Locke
2007-03-24 3:08 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-03-24 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-22 23:29 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-22 23:44 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 23:45 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-22 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-20 1:58 [PATCH] rework pm_ops pm_disk_modes foo Johannes Berg
2007-03-20 8:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Johannes Berg
2007-03-20 9:31 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 9:36 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-20 9:43 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 10:17 ` [PATCH] add firmware disk state and clean up Johannes Berg
2007-03-20 10:25 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 11:06 ` [PATCH] implement pm_ops.valid for everybody Johannes Berg
2007-03-20 13:16 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 23:44 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 22:49 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-21 21:01 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-21 22:07 ` David Brownell
2007-03-21 22:36 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-21 22:57 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-21 23:25 ` David Brownell
2007-03-21 23:31 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 10:03 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-22 17:10 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 17:18 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-22 18:13 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 18:18 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-21 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703222233.06146.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com \
--cc=ben@simtec.co.uk \
--cc=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-arm@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=preece@motorola.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox