From: tony@atomide.com
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com, ben@simtec.co.uk,
linux-arm@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, dirk.behme@de.bosch.com,
pavel@ucw.cz, johannes@sipsolutions.net, nico@cam.org,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, g.liakhovetski@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] implement pm_ops.valid for everybody
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:15:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070323131515.GA12226@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703221416.27103.david-b@pacbell.net>
* David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> [070322 17:29]:
> On Thursday 22 March 2007 12:26 pm, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > In addition to offering wakeup events for individual devices,
> > the device suspend states should be something like retention
> > and suspend, where:
>
> Maybe ... worth discussing. Most PCI drivers don't make
> that distinction, although they could (see below).
>
> What they do instead is assume the lowest device power state
> ("suspend"), and re-initialize in resume(). If Linux starts to
> support standby and STR modes properly ... then it'd make sense
> to teach more PCI drivers to try using "retention" states. But
> those drivers would still need to be prepared to re-init.
I agree, in general we should start taking advantage of the
device power states.
> > Retention is where clocks are off for a device, but power is on.
> > In this case the device registers are maintained in hardware.
>
> Analagous to PCI D1 or D2.
Hmmm, I think with PCI it's just numbering where the power
consumption decreases as the nuber increases except for D3hot
and D3cold.
> > Suspend is where clocks and power are off. In this state the
> > device registers are maintained in software.
>
> Analagous to PCI D3, especially D3cold ... although PCI D3
> certainly allows the Vaux "power well" to power some parts
> of the device, so that not all register values get reset.
Maybe actually D3hot = retention and D3cold = suspend?
PCI SOCs CLOCKS POWER
D3hot retention off on
D3cold suspend off off
> > Laptops mostly have suspend, while socs allow both retention
> > and suspend in many cases.
>
> Not quite true, as noted above. There are differences in how
> things are factored, but those mechanisms exist in both x86
> and SOC worlds. One key difference from a Linux perspective
> is probably that without ACPI in the way, a SOC design can
> make much better use of the hardware PM capabilities.
>
> Very few non-USB drivers address "retention" modes on laptops;
> USB host controller drivers need it to handle "remote wakeup",
> which one expects to work from "standby" and suspend-to-RAM.
> (Plus potentialy suspend-to-disk, but that's uncommon.)
Yeah, OK.
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-23 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-22 13:44 [PATCH] implement pm_ops.valid for everybody Scott E. Preece
2007-03-22 18:29 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 19:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2007-03-22 21:16 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 13:15 ` tony [this message]
2007-03-23 18:25 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 21:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-22 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-22 21:43 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 21:56 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-22 22:42 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-22 22:56 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 23:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-22 23:55 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 1:14 ` Matthew Locke
2007-03-23 13:17 ` tony
2007-03-23 13:35 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-23 14:52 ` tony
2007-03-23 15:17 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-23 18:51 ` Matthew Locke
2007-03-23 19:19 ` Igor Stoppa
2007-03-23 18:29 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 19:21 ` Matthew Locke
2007-03-23 20:11 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 6:46 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-23 16:15 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 21:08 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-24 0:52 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 13:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-23 17:57 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 20:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-24 0:01 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-24 0:54 ` David Brownell
2007-03-24 20:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-24 0:41 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-24 20:49 ` David Brownell
2007-03-24 21:01 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-25 1:02 ` David Brownell
2007-03-24 21:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-24 22:19 ` David Brownell
2007-03-25 10:26 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-03-25 15:20 ` David Brownell
2007-03-25 16:23 ` Jim Gettys
2007-03-25 16:55 ` David Brownell
2007-03-23 18:18 ` Matthew Locke
2007-03-24 3:08 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-03-24 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-22 23:29 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-22 23:44 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 23:45 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-22 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-20 1:58 [PATCH] rework pm_ops pm_disk_modes foo Johannes Berg
2007-03-20 8:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Johannes Berg
2007-03-20 9:31 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 9:36 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-20 9:43 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 10:17 ` [PATCH] add firmware disk state and clean up Johannes Berg
2007-03-20 10:25 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 11:06 ` [PATCH] implement pm_ops.valid for everybody Johannes Berg
2007-03-20 13:16 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-20 23:44 ` David Brownell
2007-03-20 22:49 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-21 21:01 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-21 22:07 ` David Brownell
2007-03-21 22:36 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-03-21 22:57 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-21 23:25 ` David Brownell
2007-03-21 23:31 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-22 10:03 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-22 17:10 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 17:18 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-22 18:13 ` David Brownell
2007-03-22 18:18 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-21 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070323131515.GA12226@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com \
--cc=ben@simtec.co.uk \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-arm@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox