Re: Alternative Concept [Was: Re: [RFC] CPUFreq PowerOP integration, Intro 0/3]

Vitaly Wool
2006-10-12T17:12:20Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 374 bytes --]

On 10/12/06, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
>
> I believe I did pay attention. What PowerOP has is crappy patches,
> crappy changelogs, and when you don't like it, you are obviously
> biased (or not paying attention).

I would say that by these words and by what you say later you confirm you
just haven't got any valid points you can prove your position with.

Vitaly

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 662 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]