From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:38:55 -0700 Message-ID: <200703281238.57811.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <200703281701.23876.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Maxim , Jeff Chua , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, gregkh@suse.de, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Adrian Bunk , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "Eric W. Biederman" , Jens Axboe , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 28 March 2007 9:38 am, Linus Torvalds wrote: > It's a *device*, dammit. It should save and resume like one (probably as = a = > system device). The "set_mode()" etc stuff is at a completely different = > (higher) conceptual level. Agreed, except about "probably as a system device". Last I checked, there was no good reason to use sysdev suspend()/resume() rather than platform_device suspend_late()/early_resume(). Which more or less means no good reason to use sysdev in new code... Also, making HPET use the legacy mode seems like a step backwards. - Dave