From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add suspend/resume for HPET Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:13:51 -0700 Message-ID: <200703312113.52789.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <200703311232.57505.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Jeff Chua Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Sergei Shtylyov , jgarzik@pobox.com, gregkh@suse.de, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Thomas Gleixner , "Eric W. Biederman" , Jens Axboe , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Maxim Levitsky List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 31 March 2007 8:13 pm, Jeff Chua wrote: > On 4/1/07, David Brownell wrote: > > for those will all get grouped together ... suspended "very late" and > > resumed "very early", regardless of when they get registered. Pretty > > much the driver model parts of what Linus was suggesting; clockevent > > bits would still be needed. > = > I tested your patch with CONFIG_NO_HZ=3Dy, but it still hangs while > suspending to disk (before the percent saving). Of course. No clockevent updates...