From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff.
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 02:51:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704130251.50655.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704131022.45315.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Friday 13 April 2007 1:22 am, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [appropriate CCs added]
>
> On Friday, 13 April 2007 02:33, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > just something i threw together, not in final form, but it represents
> > tossing the legacy PM stuff. at the moment, the menuconfig entry for
> > PM_LEGACY lists it as "DEPRECATED", while the help screen calls it
> > "obsolete." that's a good sign that it's getting close to the time
> > for it to go, and the removal is fairly straightforward, but there's
> > no mention of its removal in the feature removal schedule file.
>
> It's been like this for a long long time. I think you're right that it can be
> dropped, but I don't know the details (eg. why it hasn't been dropped yet).
I was just thinking about this the other day. I did an inventory of
the actual _users_ of this code when I added the deprecation to Kconfig,
and the only driver that would catch the notification was for some
old m68k platform serial driver (Amiga?) ... that won't have changed.
So the only reason not to remove it at that time was to make sure that
folk had a chance to squawk about it going away. I think it's past
time for this ancient stuff to vanish, since it's been obsolete for
most of 2.5..2.6 and there's only that one event consumer left.
Go for it!
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-13 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704122025380.3628@CPE00045a9c397f-CM001225dbafb6>
2007-04-13 8:22 ` [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-13 9:51 ` David Brownell [this message]
2007-04-15 10:23 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-17 22:12 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-17 22:28 ` David Brownell
2007-04-18 0:46 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-18 18:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-18 18:31 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-18 20:10 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704130251.50655.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox