From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc6 Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:38:43 +0200 Message-ID: <200704142238.44184.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200704142223.32410.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070414202527.GH3691@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070414202527.GH3691@stusta.de> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Maxim Levitsky , Tobias Diedrich , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Saturday, 14 April 2007 22:25, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:23:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >... > > Also, would that be feasible for you to use 'shutdown' as a workaround = in case > > the source of the problem is difficult to find and/or fix? > = > One person reporting a regression against a -rc kernel can mean > houndreds or thousands of people who will run into the same issue after = > 2.6.21 got released if a manual workaround is required... Well, in this particular case it is not very likely to happen. I have three x86_64 machines here with totally different chipsets/devices on which I'm not seeing anything like that and I believe we'd have more reports before if that were a common issue. That said, I'm not going to ignore it. I'll do my best to debug and fix it= , if Tobias helps me. :-) Greetings, Rafael