From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 11:45:04 +0200 Message-ID: <200704211145.05827.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20070416003723.GM3691@stusta.de> <20070420172147.GC20118@redhat.com> <4629547D.9090404@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4629547D.9090404@goop.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Dave Jones , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , pavel@suse.cz, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "Eric W. Biederman" , gregkh@suse.de List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Saturday, 21 April 2007 02:02, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > > Dave Jones wrote: > > > > > Andi, I think. I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this kernel. > > > > > > > > Ah, I saw you patched in CFS too, and thought it may be related. > > > > > > > > > > Well, I have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT enabled, and it still works. > > > > > > Maybe there's something in Andi's queue which is making it work? > > > > Shrug, I'm out of ideas. I'm hoping that it'll magically start working > > when people start flushing their git trees for .22 > > Maybe that'll yield a clue for something that can be backported to .21.x > > because right now, I'm completely puzzled. > > Well, it seemed reliable, but I just got a resume failure. Different > from any previous symptom I've seen: > > Intel machine check architecture supported > Intel machine check reporting enabled enabled on CPU#1 > Back to C! > Hmm, looks like something in device_power_up() went awry. Probably in sysdev_resume(). Greetings, Rafael