From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s2ram: add arch irq disable/enable hooks
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:10:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704212010.51139.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070421214557.GB2758@elf.ucw.cz>
On Saturday 21 April 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > system checkpoint/restore framework. And even userspace makes
> > that distinction clear, calling it "Hibernate" not "Suspend".
>
> Gnome deciding to confuse their users is _their_ problem.
Hot news flash for Pavel: "hibernate" is much more widely used
and understood than "software suspend". Everyone using Windows
has already been trained in what it means. But even today lots
of folk scratch their heads at "software suspend" ... "gee, isn't
all suspending done by software?"
> > I feel a Kconfig patch coming on ... ;)
>
> I do not think confusion from a change is worth the benefit.
Glad you waited to see the patch before you objected!
Oh wait -- you didn't wait. Sorry, I seem to have
misunderstood the process here. Could you explain
this new revised Linux patch process to me?
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-22 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-19 11:00 [PATCH] s2ram: add arch irq disable/enable hooks Johannes Berg
2007-04-19 21:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 15:34 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-20 6:57 ` Greg KH
2007-04-20 15:31 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-20 17:39 ` Greg KH
2007-04-20 19:37 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-20 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 19:51 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-20 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-20 20:51 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-20 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-21 13:57 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-21 14:07 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-21 15:41 ` David Brownell
2007-04-21 16:16 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-21 16:55 ` David Brownell
2007-04-21 17:01 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-21 17:06 ` David Brownell
2007-04-21 17:49 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-21 21:47 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-21 22:04 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-21 21:45 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-22 3:10 ` David Brownell [this message]
2007-04-22 13:09 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-26 11:02 ` David Woodhouse
2007-04-21 21:44 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-22 3:05 ` David Brownell
2007-04-22 13:13 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-24 13:51 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-24 18:16 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-25 3:45 ` David Brownell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-05 21:54 [PATCH] pm_ops: add irq enable/disable hooks Johannes Berg
2007-04-17 17:18 ` [PATCH] s2ram: add arch irq disable/enable hooks Johannes Berg
2007-04-18 11:27 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704212010.51139.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox