From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH] s2ram: add arch irq disable/enable hooks Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:10:50 -0700 Message-ID: <200704212010.51139.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <1176980411.6141.83.camel@johannes.berg> <200704211006.58857.david-b@pacbell.net> <20070421214557.GB2758@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070421214557.GB2758@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 21 April 2007, Pavel Machek wrote: > > system checkpoint/restore framework. And even userspace makes > > that distinction clear, calling it "Hibernate" not "Suspend". > > Gnome deciding to confuse their users is _their_ problem. Hot news flash for Pavel: "hibernate" is much more widely used and understood than "software suspend". Everyone using Windows has already been trained in what it means. But even today lots of folk scratch their heads at "software suspend" ... "gee, isn't all suspending done by software?" > > I feel a Kconfig patch coming on ... ;) > > I do not think confusion from a change is worth the benefit. Glad you waited to see the patch before you objected! Oh wait -- you didn't wait. Sorry, I seem to have misunderstood the process here. Could you explain this new revised Linux patch process to me? - Dave