From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] s2ram: add arch irq disable/enable hooks Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:47:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20070421214705.GC2758@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1176980411.6141.83.camel@johannes.berg> <200704210955.11351.david-b@pacbell.net> <1177174861.5941.26.camel@johannes.berg> <200704211006.58857.david-b@pacbell.net> <1177177763.5941.28.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1177177763.5941.28.camel@johannes.berg> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sat 2007-04-21 19:49:23, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 10:06 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > > And even userspace makes > > that distinction clear, calling it "Hibernate" not "Suspend". > > But that was quite a fight, at least in the gnome camp ;) Yep. Maybe we'll want to change "suspend to ram -> suspend", "swsusp -> hibernate" one day, but it will be big and ugly patch confusing everyone, and I do not think that day is close. > > I feel a Kconfig patch coming on ... ;) > > Not from me. But you'll get an updated one for this :) Please don't. Original patch is fine. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html