From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.21-rc7] kconfig mentioneds 'hibernation' not just swsusp Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:21:02 -0400 Message-ID: <200704212321.02822.lenb@kernel.org> References: <200704212002.59554.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200704212002.59554.david-b@pacbell.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Andrew Morton , Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > In principle it does not require ACPI or APM, although for example > - ACPI will be used if available. > + ACPI will be used for the final steps when it is available. One > + of the reasons to use software suspend is that the firmware hooks > + for suspend states like suspend-to-RAM (STR) often don't work very > + well with Linux. I don't think the help section of a config options is a good place for editorial. -Len