From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] s2ram: add arch irq disable/enable hooks Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:09:49 +0000 Message-ID: <20070422130948.GC4236@ucw.cz> References: <1176980411.6141.83.camel@johannes.berg> <200704211006.58857.david-b@pacbell.net> <20070421214557.GB2758@elf.ucw.cz> <200704212010.51139.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704212010.51139.david-b@pacbell.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: David Brownell Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > > system checkpoint/restore framework. And even userspace makes > > > that distinction clear, calling it "Hibernate" not "Suspend". > > > > Gnome deciding to confuse their users is _their_ problem. > > Hot news flash for Pavel: "hibernate" is much more widely used > and understood than "software suspend". Everyone using Windows > has already been trained in what it means. But even today lots > of folk scratch their heads at "software suspend" ... "gee, isn't > all suspending done by software?" Well, in apm case it is firmware, not software. That's how the name was born. > > > I feel a Kconfig patch coming on ... ;) > > > > I do not think confusion from a change is worth the benefit. > > Glad you waited to see the patch before you objected! Uf I thought you were going to s/CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND/CONFIG/HIBERNATION/ over the kernel, and wanted to spare you some time. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html