From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/2] kernel: don't update load average during snapshot/shutdown Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:14:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20070427151449.GS22250@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200704271700.52678.rjw@sisk.pl> <1177686164.3565.24.camel@johannes.berg> <20070427150527.GQ22250@elf.ucw.cz> <1177686732.3565.30.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1177686732.3565.30.camel@johannes.berg> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: Pekka J Enberg , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, nigel@nigel.suspend2.net List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > I think we should track -mm for now. git tree means Linus has to > > trust you, and if he does not, you are in _big_ trouble. > > We could still generate patches from the actual git tree and send those > on to -mm. Bit more work though. Dunno. I try to import patches I > > see on git history generates "bad" patches for merging. If you merge foo, then do two fixups, it is three patches; very nasty to review. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html