From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, pavel@ucw.cz
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/2] kernel: don't update load average during snapshot/shutdown
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:00:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704271700.52678.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704271629150.15297@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
On Friday, 27 April 2007 15:29, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
>
> As explained by Nigel, Sendmail and some other programs look at the
> load average and stop delivering when it gets too high. The CPU
> intensiveness of suspending to disk pushes the load average up quite
> high but post-resume we shouldn't really take that into account. Not
> updating the load average therefore makes snapshot/shutdown invisible
> to sendmail and so on.
>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
This clashes with the recent freezer changes in -mm quite violently.
We're moving the freezer to kernel/freezer.c and we're introducing a special
field in task_struct for the freezer flags.
Please have a look at the freezer changes queued up in -mm and the freezer
patches recently sent.
Greetings,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-27 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-27 13:29 [RFC/PATCH 2/2] kernel: don't update load average during snapshot/shutdown Pekka J Enberg
2007-04-27 14:52 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-27 14:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-04-27 21:32 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-04-27 22:12 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-27 22:18 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-04-27 22:25 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-27 23:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-04-28 8:01 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-28 8:26 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-04-28 10:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-28 18:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-28 22:52 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-04-27 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-04-27 14:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-04-27 15:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-27 15:02 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-27 15:05 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-27 15:12 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-27 15:14 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-27 15:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-27 19:56 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-27 15:16 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-27 15:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704271700.52678.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox