From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/2] kernel: don't update load average during snapshot/shutdown Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:53:42 +0200 Message-ID: <200704271753.43240.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20070427150527.GQ22250@elf.ucw.cz> <1177686732.3565.30.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1177686732.3565.30.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: Pekka J Enberg , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Friday, 27 April 2007 17:12, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 17:05 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I think we should track -mm for now. git tree means Linus has to > > trust you, and if he does not, you are in _big_ trouble. > > We could still generate patches from the actual git tree and send those > on to -mm. Bit more work though. Dunno. I try to import patches I see on > the mailing list into my own patch queue, but that seems not to be > effective all the time (never saw the freezer changes anywhere for > example) The freezer patches went through the LKML. Generally, I expect we'll have quite a lot of patches floating around in the near future and a separate common tree would be handy, if someone has the time to maintain it. I can set up a quilt patch series and export it for everyone from my webserver if that helps. Greetings, Rafael