public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uli Luckas <u.luckas@road.de>
To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Why schedule in thaw_processes
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:53:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706281553.48897.u.luckas@road.de> (raw)

Dear PM Team,
i am working my way through the Linux power managemen subsystem, trying to 
understand, benchmark and improve our ARM based device's suspend/resume 
cycles.
I measure the time from a wakeup event until suspend_finish() returns.
I was very confused, why this interval varies between 150ms and 300ms. Walking 
the code I found the difference between 150ms wakeups and 300ms wakeups to 
come from a call to schedule() in thaw_processes().
I do realise, that these extra 150ms are not wasted, as they are spent in 
other threads, doing what these threads need to do any way. Still an unneeded 
schedule() is overhead in itself and probably would not have been introduced 
without reason.

So, can anyone explain, why this schedule() is of any benefit?

regards,
Uli

-- 

------- ROAD ...the handyPC Company - - -  ) ) )

Uli Luckas
Software Development

ROAD GmbH
Bennigsenstr. 14 | 12159 Berlin | Germany
fon: +49 (30) 230069 - 64 | fax: +49 (30) 230069 - 69
url: www.road.de

Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 96688 B
Managing directors: Hans-Peter Constien, Hubertus von Streit

             reply	other threads:[~2007-06-28 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-28 13:53 Uli Luckas [this message]
2007-06-29 13:00 ` Why schedule in thaw_processes Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200706281553.48897.u.luckas@road.de \
    --to=u.luckas@road.de \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox