From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:42:13 +0200 Message-ID: <200707031342.14295.oliver@neukum.org> References: <20070703042916.GA17240@srcf.ucam.org> <200707030944.18702.oliver@neukum.org> <18058.12724.163599.707035@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <18058.12724.163599.707035@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Matthew Garrett , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 schrieb Paul Mackerras: > I'm actually having a hard time thinking of how to test your assertion > since there are so few things on a typical computer that are plain > character devices driving real hardware. =A0A serial port would be abou= t > the only one; keyboards and mice (and serial ports :) are USB these > days, or ADB on older powerbooks. USB devices certainly have suspend methods. Regards Oliver