From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:50:00 +0200 Message-ID: <200707031350.01111.oliver@neukum.org> References: <20070703042916.GA17240@srcf.ucam.org> <200707031327.56577.oliver@neukum.org> <1183463113.10386.114.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1183463113.10386.114.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt: > On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 13:27 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > You are talking about hibernate, right? =C2=A0Suspending (to ram) i= s > > > instantaneous, in that _after_ suspend no CPU is active obviously. > >=20 > > If that is so, why do you care? If it is really atomic, fuse has no > > chance > > to call out to its component in user space either. Removing the > > freezer > > cannot make a difference. >=20 > It's not atomic. You will get called after suspend() in drivers. The > thing is ... you just have to deal with it :-) So you are volunteering to go through all drivers >:-> ? Regards Oliver