From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM
	pathway
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 20:26:34 +0200
Message-ID: <200707032026.34649.oliver@neukum.org>
References: <20070703042916.GA17240@srcf.ucam.org>
	<200707031508.45595.rjw@sisk.pl> <200707031709.29968.rjw@sisk.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <200707031709.29968.rjw@sisk.pl>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > > The main reason for deadlocks is because we do a sys_sync() after the
> > > freeze, which we shouldn't do.
> > 
> > So why don't we remove the sys_sync() from freeze_processes() instead?
> 
> The patch follows (untested).

And a further question. The freezer is not atomic. What do you do
if a task not yet frozen calls sys_sync(), but fuse is already frozen?

	Regards
		Oliver