From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: malicious filesystems (was Re: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 14:58:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20070708135829.GF21668@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20070705091801.GB3084@elf.ucw.cz> <20070705115400.GF3984@ucw.cz> <20070707121729.GC3111@elf.ucw.cz> <20070707233315.GB3820@elf.ucw.cz> <20070708123748.GB3866@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070708123748.GB3866@ucw.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, Miklos Szeredi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 12:37:48PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > I'm talking malicious _filesystems_ here, and yes, fuse is first of > this kind. We want to handle unresponding NFS, but I believe handling > malicious NFS server nicely is slightly out of scope. If your variant doesn't handle compromised NFS server, your variant is needs to be fixed...