From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH -mm 1/7] Freezer: Document relationship with memory shrinking
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:08:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707120008.51074.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707120006.50095.rjw@sisk.pl>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
One important reason to freeze tasks, which is that we don't want them to
allocate memory after freeing it for the hibernation image, has not been
documented. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
---
Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1.orig/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt 2007-07-11 20:48:04.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt 2007-07-11 20:50:24.000000000 +0200
@@ -81,7 +81,16 @@ hibernation image has been created and b
The majority of these are user space processes, but if any of the kernel threads
may cause something like this to happen, they have to be freezable.
-2. The second reason is to prevent user space processes and some kernel threads
+2. Next, to create the hibernation image we need to free a sufficient amount of
+memory (approximately 50% of available RAM) and we need to do that before
+devices are deactivated, because we generally need them for swapping out. Then,
+after the memory for the image has been freed, we don't want tasks to allocate
+additional memory and we prevent them from doing that by freezing them earlier.
+[Of course, this also means that device drivers should not allocate substantial
+amounts of memory from their .suspend() callbacks before hibernation, but this
+is e separate issue.]
+
+3. The third reason is to prevent user space processes and some kernel threads
from interfering with the suspending and resuming of devices. A user space
process running on a second CPU while we are suspending devices may, for
example, be troublesome and without the freezing of tasks we would need some
@@ -111,7 +120,7 @@ frozen before the driver's .suspend() ca
thawed after the driver's .resume() callback has run, so it won't be accessing
the device while it's suspended.
-3. Another reason for freezing tasks is to prevent user space processes from
+4. Another reason for freezing tasks is to prevent user space processes from
realizing that hibernation (or suspend) operation takes place. Ideally, user
space processes should not notice that such a system-wide operation has occurred
and should continue running without any problems after the restore (or resume
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-11 22:06 [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/7] Freezer update (updated) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-11 22:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-07-11 22:10 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/7] Freezer: Do not sync filesystems from freeze_processes Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-11 22:42 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-11 22:12 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 3/7] Freezer: Prevent new tasks from inheriting TIF_FREEZE set Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-11 22:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-11 22:13 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 4/7] Freezer: Introduce freezer-firendly waiting macros Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-11 22:56 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-12 10:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-11 23:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-12 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 4/7] Freezer: Introduce freezer-firendly waiting macros (updated) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-12 12:23 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 4/7] Freezer: Introduce freezer-firendly waiting macros (updated 2x) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-11 22:14 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 5/7] Freezer: Do not send signals to kernel threads (updated) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-11 22:16 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 6/7] Freezer: Be more verbose Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-11 22:58 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-12 10:39 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 6/7] Freezer: Be more verbose (updated) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-11 22:17 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 7/7] Freezer: Use freezing timeout more efficiently Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-12 10:38 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 7/7] Freezer: Use freezing timeout more efficiently (updated) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-13 23:43 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 7/7] Freezer: Use freezing timeout more efficiently Pavel Machek
2007-07-14 9:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200707120008.51074.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox