public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/2] Freezer: Use wait queue instead of busy looping
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:01:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707251401.48340.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)

Hi,

I thought it would be a good idea to make try_to_freeze_tasks() use a wait
queue instead of looping while tasks are supposed to be entering the
refrigerator.  The details are in the second patch changelog.

The first patch is the known "make it more verbose" thing.

Comments welcome.

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth

             reply	other threads:[~2007-07-25 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-25 12:01 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-07-25 12:03 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 1/2] Freezer: Be more verbose Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-25 12:27   ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-25 12:09 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/2] Freezer: Use wait queue instead of busy looping Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-25 12:28   ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-25 12:55     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-25 13:29   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-25 14:03     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-25 14:24       ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-26 12:24         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-26 12:43           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31  8:01           ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31  9:39             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 10:00               ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 10:17                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 10:08               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 10:02                 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 22:25                   ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/3] Freezer: Use wait queue instead of busy looping (updated) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 22:26                     ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 1/3] Freezer: Use wait queue instead of busy looping Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-01  7:59                       ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 22:28                     ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/3] Freezer: Measure the time of freezing tasks Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-01  8:28                       ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 22:29                     ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 3/3] Freezer: Replace the timeout Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-01  8:31                       ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-01 10:43                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-05 21:37                           ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-05 22:38                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-05 22:53                               ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200707251401.48340.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox